Introducing software: These 11 influencing factors determine strategy

When implementing complex enterprise software, choosing the appropriate implementation strategy is an important step that determines the success or failure of the implementation project. The selection of possible strategies is diverse:

Based on practical experience, eleven key framework conditions can essentially be identified that determine which strategy is the most suitable for a company. These eleven factors can be divided into:

• Three given corporate factors
• Four company factors that can be influenced
• Four product factors

Some business requirements and goals that influence the selection of the appropriate implementation strategy can only be actively influenced by project managers from the software vendor and the company to a limited extent.

The number of company locations and departments

How many sites or departments will use the new software in the future? Companies usually introduce software for all their sites. Internationally, however, other regulations may take effect that a software does not support, so it is decided in the preparation phase to exclude international locations from the introduction. The number of sites also already excludes some implementation strategies, for example:

• With one site, it is not possible to roll out regionally iteratively or on a pilot basis.
• With two sites, it is not possible to implement regionally iteratively with subsequent big bang.

Process changes

When new software is introduced, there are usually process changes. Project managers should know how many and what process changes will occur as a result of the new system:

It may be that...

• the new software requires process changes (e.g., the new software only allows team members to track time on tasks)
• the new software enables process changes (e.g. new features allow risk management)
• process improvements were already planned beforehand, for which the change phase is now used by the software.

If the process changes involve the conversion of old processes, fewer measures usually need to be taken because the users are already accustomed to the processes. New processes, on the other hand, may mean that change management measures are necessary.

Value-adding processes should not be adapted to the new software under any circumstances. These should always be mapped by the new solution in such a way that they do not need to be changed.

A software introduction is also a change management process. It is important to get employees on board. Before introducing new structures, project managers must transparently present who will have to deal with which effects and changes. The term "change communication" describes the measures required to achieve this.

Process changes in the software introduction project lead to

• more effort, as they require description and explanation
• Increased project risk, especially in the case of dissatisfied users or management.

The more processes have to be adapted by the introduction of the software, the less suitable a Big Bang introduction is and the more iterative models come into question.

Time for the implementation project

Time is one of the factors of the magic triangle in project management, along with costs and content goals. Transferred to a software introduction project, this means that with the same costs and more time, more content-related goals can be achieved. Reducing the duration always increases the risk. An enforced schedule, for example, makes a project-oriented introduction impossible. The following aspects, for example, have an influence on the schedule:

• Deadline constraints: Expiring licenses, commitments to customers, etc.
• Cost savings with rapid rollout: licenses can be terminated earlier, better invoicing, etc. 
• Legal framework: EU DSVGO as of May, obligation to record working hours, etc.

Experience shows: The effort and duration of a software implementation is almost always underestimated.

The architecture and characteristics of the software itself influence the strategy selection with regard to four different factors. To assess these influencing factors, it may be helpful to involve a consultant from the software vendor. The four product factors are:

Number of modules

The more modules are to be introduced, the more complex and costly is not only the introduction process itself, but also the more unexpected resistance can arise among users, the more changes in existing workflows and processes are necessary, and the higher is the risk of failure.

Number of interfaces

The complexity and number of interfaces are important factors for a software implementation project. For big bang or regionally iterative implementations, all interfaces should be in place before the implementation begins. If the interfaces are complex and the software manufacturer has to program them on the core product, this can take so much time that, for example, the decisive advantage of a big bang introduction would not come into play at all. The more complex or numerous the interfaces are, the more likely it is that functional iteration or piloting should be used.

Some interfaces can be configured individually and can be scheduled more flexibly by the software manufacturer. New interfaces may need to be scheduled into their release planning dfor the standard. The release cycle can be a rough indicator of timing. For big bang implementations, interfaces should be tested with real data before the implementation deadline.

Depth of necessary customizations

In order to map individual processes in the company in the best possible way, customer-specific adaptations to standard software must be made. Individual enhancements to the software by the customer tend to be more error-prone than customizations by the software vendor. These errors must be found and corrected.

Quantity of systems to be replaced

Four further factors are given, but can be influenced to a large extent. The software vendor's consultant and the company's internal project manager should try to actively influence them before and during the project to ensure a successful implementation. If they apply the right measures and turn the appropriate adjusting screws, they can improve the company factors that can be influenced to such an extent that

• a wider choice of implementation strategies is available, or
• significantly increase the probability of success of the selected implementation strategy.

Even before selecting software, a company should set out its requirements for the new system in writing. Equally important are the requirements of the future users, i.e., the employees. Work processes of different departments and cross-departmental workflows should also be documented and handed over to the software provider in a specification sheet.

A software solution can change existing structures and power relationships within a company. If the project team installs a project management office (PMO) or a steering committee, management should support or at least approve.

Lack of management support will cause an implementation project to fail. For the Big Bang and Big Bang implementation strategies with subsequent functionally iterative implementation, a lack of management support is even a criterion for exclusion. Management support can be gained or retained by providing regular information on the status of the project. In particular, management should be informed about the project objectives at the beginning.

The management support factor also includes the time and cost factors that are not listed separately: If management support is high, more time is normally released for the project team. The same applies to the very often mentioned factor of costs or project budget.

If the project manager responsible for the software implementation is repeatedly withdrawn by management in favor of customer projects, an implementation project will drag on, cause higher costs and cannot be completed in the best possible quality.

However, the involvement of too high a management level can have a counterproductive effect. Particularly in corporate groups and holding structures, it is often easier and also completely sufficient to convince the site manager of the necessity of the software introduction. In this way, the unnecessary creation of bureaucratic hurdles can be avoided.

The more motivated the future software users are, the smoother the introduction project will run. However, the larger a company is, the more difficult it is to push through a software introduction against the will of the employees. If the employees have a negative attitude towards the introduction, you should choose an iterative approach and continuously fight for more acceptance in parallel. The Big Bang strategy with subsequent functional introduction, for example, has no chance of success without employee motivation. To increase employee acceptance and motivation, employees should

• Understand the goals,
• recognize the benefits and
• be aware of the risks associated with the upcoming organizational changes.

The experience of the project team and project management is the all-important factor. If no experience is available, all methods carry a significant risk. The more experienced those responsible for implementation are,

• the better they assess risks,
• the more flexible they are in responding to unforeseen complications,
• the faster and more confident they are in making decisions, and
• the more complex introduction strategies can be chosen.

Experienced project managers know how to get management and users excited about the new software and how to meet many requirements. Inexperienced project managers should not be responsible for big bang or big bang implementation projects followed by functional iterative implementation.

In small and medium-sized companies, the phenomenon can often be observed that the selection of suitable software is delegated to interns or students. This is certainly possible and makes sense. However, the management of the implementation project should definitely be taken over by an experienced colleague.

If you do not have an appropriately experienced project manager in your team for your implementation project, contact us. We have accumulated decades of experience in the implementation of complex enterprise software and can support your project team individually, specifically and competently through training, workshops and in a consulting capacity.

Contact Projektron

Among the business factors that cannot be influenced (highlighted in green), time pressure is an exclusion criterion against iterative approaches. Many process changes speak against a big bang introduction. The more sites and users there are, the more suitable iterative approaches are.

The decisive factor for choosing the right strategy is usually the company factors that can be influenced. Each of these four factors can be improved with appropriate measures, so that other strategies can be considered. The tendency toward either iterative or big bang approaches thus results in a large number of concrete implementation strategies.

There are often several strategies that come into question under the given framework conditions. Managers and consultants should focus primarily on the four corporate factors that can be influenced. Those who have the opportunity to positively influence these factors for the implementation project automatically have more freedom in the choice of strategy.

Expert tool for strategy finding: advantages for customers and consultants

The expert tool helps consultants,

	objectively select the best possible implementation strategy for the customer's requirements,
	initiate targeted measures to optimize the influencing factors for the application of the respective strategy.

The tool offers customers

	maximum transparency: it makes the consultant's recommendation comprehensible and creates acceptance for the measures among the workforce.
	the possibility of self-determination: it empowers the customer to make his own choice for the desired implementation strategy.

In the definition phase of the software introduction project, the choice of the appropriate introduction strategy is the central factor that determines the success or failure of the software introduction. Choosing an inappropriate strategy is one of the most common mistakes in software introduction. When deciding on a strategy, you must evaluate the complex interaction of various influencing factors and identify combinations of characteristics that exclude or make certain strategies mandatory.

This task is very complex and can only be decided internally within the company with a great deal of experience. If you are introducing new enterprise software, you should enlist the help of specialists and manage the introduction project together with the software provider's user consultants on a basis of trust.